Ascensionism®

INTUITION
Etymology

The word entered English in the late 15th century.

• Latin origin: intuitio ("a looking at"), from the verb intueri ("to look at, consider, contemplate").
• Intueri breaks down as:
  
  • in- ("into, at, upon")
  • tueri ("to look at, watch, guard, protect")
• The literal sense was "knowledge obtained by looking within" or "immediate perception."

By the mid-17th century in English, it had acquired its modern meaning of non-rational, immediate understanding.

EMPATHY
Etymology

The word empathy is relatively modern in English.

• First appeared in English around 1909–1912.
• Coined as a translation of the German word Einfühlung (“feeling into”), used in psychology and aesthetics by theorists like Theodor Lipps.
• From Ancient Greek:
  
  • em- (variant of en-) = “in, within, into”
  • pathos = “feeling, emotion, suffering, passion”

Literal meaning: “feeling into” or “in-feeling.”

The Greek pathos is the same root found in:

• Sympathy (“feeling together/with”)
• Apopathy (“without feeling”)
• Telepathy, etc.

Today I'll have to do it as an attachment!! 

From Christian:
I wanted to share a technical observation I made today and a practical facilitation tip from a session I ran today.
While delivering a Mass Handling process, I stumbled upon a vital realization regarding how we query the charge on a client's case—specifically when standard verbal prompts seem to educe nothing.

Control/Command Phrases vs. Non-Verbal Control/Command Impulses
During the session, I asked the standard question:
Quote

Quote

"Are there any control or command phrases in this mass?"

The client looked, paused, and said: "No. No phrases."

Usually, I would accept this at face value and move on. But I paused and thought to myself: Okay, there are no "phrases," but... A phrase is composed of words. But on the downward time trail, words are a very late development. Long before Beings formulated spoken language or written words, we operated on raw, non-verbal, spiritual concepts, vectors of force, and pure intentional impulses.

I acknowledged their answer and pivoted, bypassing the verbal level to target the raw spiritual phenomenon directly:
Quote

Quote

"Connected to the mass, is there some kind of impulse in there intended to control or command you?"

But please tell me, what to do when the client runs into a boil-off? Sit back, patiently, and let it bleed out all by itself or gently nudge them through? 

Simply put, the best we have come up with, so far, that explains it better, is that the spiritual being’s accomplishment of the main or prime goal, the vision, the codes etc., is what fuels the drive that impels, pushes, motivates and commands, compels survival via a body in the physical universe.
    To accomplish the goal is the drive and motivation for survival.
    So the goal is senior to survival and drives, impels, motivates it etc.

Alan stated in the Gods in Disguise book, on page 57, quote; “The SUPREME BEING separated into trillions of separate SUPREME SPIRITS.”  I believe he meant to say; The SUPREME SPIRIT, SOURCE, INFINITY, CREATOR separated into trillions of separate SUPREME BEINGS (having existence).
      I like the use of the word manifested rather than separated.  Separated or fractionalized tends to lead one to think that, that which has separated or fractionalized has been exhausted or lessened in quantity.