61
Wins & Successes In Application / Re: Unknowns in an Area lead to Inconsequentiality
Last post by Roger Boswarva -Looking at Christian’s great post on IVUPPUMIES, I am seeing a missed step in the formula that would make the Rundown an even bigger and an easier winner . . .
The formula, as it stands, is an action of finding an area of pain and or unwanted outcome and “fixing” it . . . it parallels the approach of Dianetics, Scientology and Psychology/Psychiatry . . . find what’s wrong and undo it without finding and addressing WHY it went wrong and handling that earlier correct source.
In the case of IVUPPUMIES what is being missed is the PRIOR situation attempted to being solved by/with the INTENTION that begins the IVUPPUMIES’s existence and accumulated charge.
Looking at all of this I see I would add to and preface the IVUPPUMIES handling I would look to (locate) the prior situation that needed “handling” based on the evaluation that led to the INTENTION that began the IVUPPUMIES sequence.
My observation, as noted in my revised SPEIEPER formula, is that apart from involuntarily replicated intending running on unthinking automatic, all intentions are preceded by and based on an evaluation performed to determine what needs be done about the situation perceived and evaluated.
Rog