91
Wins & Successes In Application / Re: Clearing away enormous charge on "Exchange with others"
Last post by Christian -Thank you for sharing.
Christian
Thank you for sharing.
Christian
92
Wins & Successes In Application / Re: Clearing away enormous charge on "Exchange with others"
Last post by Roger Boswarva -I too have had the "not wanting to be known" solution deployed (so I could not be made experience the abuse from "others/another") . . . it is, in actuality, a major self sabotage that caused me to actually become unpresent and non-existent to others . . . all in an effort to not be affected by their abuse!
Silly, silly solutions we can have running on involuntary replication!
Roger
93
Wins & Successes In Application / Re: Clearing away enormous charge on "Exchange with others"
Last post by Jorge S. -Thanks for sharing and keep winning!!!
94
Wins & Successes In Application / Clearing away enormous charge on "Exchange with others"
Last post by knowledgeracer -I continued this session in a solo fashion at home using the expanded clean slate process. The first command I happened to engage with was "what about exchange must not be experienced". The charge was so heavy that I couldn't come up with an answer. So I decided to just throw out answers and see what would read on the meter. I found my answer after a bunch of items. These items were fear of being known, fear of being found out, and fear of being exposed. They were all compacted into a huge mass of charge. This mass was a major blocker to exchange. I ran repeater on the following control phrases - "don't be known, don't be found out, don't expose yourself" for a while. The meter and I experienced a large number of blowdowns. A vast amount of life force particles were set free.
I now attribute a lot of this charge to my career exchanging as a healer in past lives during the Roman Empire, the Middle Ages and the Witch Hunts in Early America. All these earlier periods of time as a healer ended with a painful punishment where I (my body) was put to death. Hence my reluctance to exchange in an independent manner became quite solidified. This charged item, exchange, has been screwing me up for many lifetimes and really screwing me up this lifetime.
Still need to finish the run down as exchange is a very large topic but I have made serious progress on this topic of Exchange.
Anthony
95
Wins & Successes In Application / Re: Unknowns in an Area lead to Inconsequentiality
Last post by Jorge S. -I'll try this way!
96
Wins & Successes In Application / Re: Unknowns in an Area lead to Inconsequentiality
Last post by Roger Boswarva -Good catch Rog!Jorge, it may be that our native languages have different grammar constructs in that we place our adjectives differently . . . so I'll reword my thinking to and observations to be more fully precise.
I've been reading and studying this subject and I have a question.
To locate the ítem to handle by going backward in the sequence, could these be the (rough) questions we could use?
Forwards:
Perception Step: What are your perceptions about (the situation, area or subject)?
Evaluation Step: What evaluation(s) do you get about (what you perceived)?, or, As a (Spiritual Bieng / Godlike Being) how do you evaluate (what you perceived)?
Intention Step: What do you choose (or want) to do about (the evaluation)?
Backwards:
Intention Step: What did you want to be/do/have (the intention) for?
Evaluation Step: What evaluation led you to want to be/do/have (the intention)?
Perception Step: What situation did you perceive that led you to formulate the (evaluation)?
Perception Step: What did you perceive about (the situation)?
Basically, development of either a SPEIEPER or an IVUPAMI occurs because we are dealing with life and we come across situations that we have to deal with or otherwise manage. And the way we deal with what we have to handle follows our analysis-cum-evaluation of what we perceive the thing/situation to be.
Doing it all in solo session, as I do, I would simply look to, "What was the prior situation I perceived, and what was my evaluation/analysis of it that led to the INTENTION that began the IVUPAMI forming.
In processing a client, one would have to form the question in the grammatical sense of the client's native language (or English if they are fluent in it).
Edit-PS . . . I just had a cognition while reviewing all this . . .
My observation and cognition is that in my case state, I span enormous amounts of time trail. When I view things to be handled in session, I automatically span the relative time trail span that includes all of the event that is the effect/outcome (example the actual IVUPAMI mass), PLUS the prior Time Stream event(s) that preceded and caused or led to the creation of the IVUPAMI.
I my earlier years, and this is likely the case with all of your regular clients . . . they are NOT spanning that amount of time . . . they are stuck in and battling the EFFECT POINT at the end of the cycle. Folks suffering the effects of a MASS, Engram, or UPSET are stuck in the end point-outcome of the event. What preceded and set up that effect and outcome, they have lost awareness of.
And the reason for this occlusion on their/our case is our typical wrong answer solutions such as: going unpresent and absencing of self from what we don't want to experience, running not-know, and such.
Hence the importance of the point that I have raised concerning locating and handling the prior set-up and evaluations and decisions that led to the fixing and hang up of the unwanted.
Rog
Rog
97
Wins & Successes In Application / ANALYSIS OF THE CURRENT VALIDITY OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
Last post by Roger Boswarva -As you long time members know, I am am a member of various scientific and professional associations, and hence it has always interested me to analyze and understand their practices and prejudices that determine relative value of performance.
As noted in the linked post on "X" I discuss the reason why the cult of "Scientism" has rather fanatically restricted itself to investigation of the Physical Universe aspects of existence, even when they say they are investigating the "mind" it is always done in terms of the mind being part of the physical universe (of the Brain). But then, "Science" as currently practiced has no clear or correct definition of what actually and exactly is the mind and how did it come into existence.
In any event, I recently had the insight of exactly why modern scientific inquiry became stuck and restricted to seeking knowledge only into the physical and considering that the only valid research is that which has been aligned to or validated by physical universe means . . . the notion actually exists that any knowledge gained by pure perception and not "validated or proven" by math or other physical universe reference is invalid.
The truth of our existence as Spiritual Beings is not a subject of knowledge pursued in "science."
The reason for this is written up in the submission I had attempted to present to the Russian sponsored "Open Dialogue"
https://dialog.russia.ru/en/about/ . . . but it seems we in the USA have a censorship block preventing communication and exchange of ideas with Russia via the internet.
You guys can read all about it on my recent Post on "X" here:
https://x.com/RogerBoswarva/status/1983236301584277658
I'd appreciate it if you'd read it and make lucid comments, cross post it, etc., such that others begin to notice it.
Rog
98
Wins & Successes In Application / Re: Unknowns in an Area lead to Inconsequentiality
Last post by Christian -In the case of IVUPPUMIES what is being missed is the PRIOR situation attempted to being solved by/with the INTENTION that begins the IVUPPUMIES’s existence and accumulated charge.
Looking at all of this I see I would add to and preface the IVUPPUMIES handling I would look to (locate) the prior situation that needed “handling” based on the evaluation that led to the INTENTION that began the IVUPPUMIES sequence.
Ha! Yes, good one!
I will have a look how it would apply to my current scenario!
Thank you Roger!
Christian
99
Wins & Successes In Application / Re: Unknowns in an Area lead to Inconsequentiality
Last post by Jorge S. -I've been reading and studying this subject and I have a question.
To locate the ítem to handle by going backward in the sequence, could these be the (rough) questions we could use?
Forwards:
Perception Step: What are your perceptions about (the situation, area or subject)?
Evaluation Step: What evaluation(s) do you get about (what you perceived)?, or, As a (Spiritual Bieng / Godlike Being) how do you evaluate (what you perceived)?
Intention Step: What do you choose (or want) to do about (the evaluation)?
Backwards:
Intention Step: What did you want to be/do/have (the intention) for?
Evaluation Step: What evaluation led you to want to be/do/have (the intention)?
Perception Step: What situation did you perceive that led you to formulate the (evaluation)?
Perception Step: What did you perceive about (the situation)?
100
Wins & Successes In Application / Re: Unknowns in an Area lead to Inconsequentiality
Last post by Roger Boswarva -Looking at Christian’s great post on IVUPPUMIES, I am seeing a missed step in the formula that would make the Rundown an even bigger and an easier winner . . .
The formula, as it stands, is an action of finding an area of pain and or unwanted outcome and “fixing” it . . . it parallels the approach of Dianetics, Scientology and Psychology/Psychiatry . . . find what’s wrong and undo it without finding and addressing WHY it went wrong and handling that earlier correct source.
In the case of IVUPPUMIES what is being missed is the PRIOR situation attempted to being solved by/with the INTENTION that begins the IVUPPUMIES’s existence and accumulated charge.
Looking at all of this I see I would add to and preface the IVUPPUMIES handling I would look to (locate) the prior situation that needed “handling” based on the evaluation that led to the INTENTION that began the IVUPPUMIES sequence.
My observation, as noted in my revised SPEIEPER formula, is that apart from involuntarily replicated intending running on unthinking automatic, all intentions are preceded by and based on an evaluation performed to determine what needs be done about the situation perceived and evaluated.
Rog