THE TWO PARTS OF EXISTENCE
OK guys and gals . . . these notes below are a work in progress which I post in that context for you to add any insights or thoughts you might have.
Bernard Carr, mentioned following, is one of the arch “think, think, think” guys among the PhD types I deal with on the Scientific and Medical Network (SMN).
Boz note following Bernard Carr’s “bad” synch versus “good” synch . . .
The issue is basically whether you are in control of your perceptions and your relationship with and to the time trail you are interfacing with!
What I observe from both the presenters and the responders . . . is that they are all responding from the/their positions as effect and inflow of receipt from the environment they are relating with. None are relating their observations, if any occurred, from the perspective and practice of having caused, co-created any events or effects or experiences they “observed.”
BOZ OBSERVATION-REALIZATION . . . the whole truth is BOTH the act of causation and the outcomes experienced. These folks only are investigating HALF of the event!!!!
Re: GOD
https://ascensionism.org/forum/index.php?topic=1302.0;topicseen
To be noted we have updated and corrected our terms of reference because we have long observed the word “DUPLICATION” as has been used is inaccurate. It actually means to “to make a copy or replicate” . . . it is an error carried froward from LRH’s grandiosity.
The more exact word to use to refer to the act of “getting or understanding what another has communicated or what a thing is,” is the word APPERCEPTION. I have written on the forum on this point before.
god.memo
10 december 1996
BE CLOSER TO GOD
"So God created man in his own image."
Genesis 1:27
King James Bible
To understand one's self it is important to understand God.
God is a spiritual being with infinite attributes.
Some of these infinite attributes are:
KNOWLEDGE
IMMORTALITY
POWER
RESPONSIBILITY
SURVIVAL
INTEGRITY
FRIENDLINESS
LEADERSHIP
WISDOM
HONESTY
JUDGMENT
LOVE
JUSTICE
HARMONY
GOODNESS
TRUTH
"Image," by definition (a duplication of, a perfect copy, a reflection), means that man is basically a Spiritual Being that has the potential for:
KNOWLEDGE
IMMORTALITY
POWER
RESPONSIBILITY
SURVIVAL
INTEGRITY
FRIENDLINESS
LEADERSHIP
WISDOM
HONESTY
JUDGMENT
LOVE
JUSTICE
HARMONY
GOODNESS
TRUTH
To be closer to God, it is necessary to duplicate those qualities that God has.
Failure to duplicate God's attributes is the basis of sin.
By degrading one's self and one's potentials, one is moving away from God.
By improving one's self and one's potentials, one is able to come closer to God.
As one duplicates God's attributes, one finds that the Spiritual Power within oneself begins to flow forth.
ALAN C. WALTER
22 April 1986
Revised 30 June 1995
Copyright (C) 1986, 1995
Alan C. Walter
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
My personal observation derives from investigating the question: “Who or What is God?”
My observation and experience is that it is us, ourselves when in our original pure state of existence before we altered ourselves by practice of wrong answer solutions. (Relate the heavens and our first altering of that state.)
As noted in my earlier writings, I state that in our original Native Pure State as Infinite Spiritual Presences we existed in Unity As and Of One Presence. And in this state, referred to elsewhere as The Supreme Beings Universe, while we each knew we were individual existences, our awareness and capacity of apperception was precise, complete and exact.
But, for reasons discussed elsewhere, we altered this perfection of unity and introduced the solution of the Universal Vision of departure from the perfect unity of “oneness and apperception.”
It was this act of postulating the “Universal Visions” that introduced TIME as a dimension conceived of future existence and action.
Today, we a bedeviled by the circumstance and the belief and practice that our Game Structure is composed of TWO PARTS, two parts that exist separately as Cause/Creation and the Outcome/Effect . . . with each existing in its own (separate) time.
But as I realized and experienced in my insight dealing with this matter, the whole truth of any existence that has been brought into being is both the causation and the resulting outcome.
Modern scientists in their research endeavors only ever look at and study extant outcomes that remain after causation, but investigation into the what and how of the prior cause is omitted by them.
When I had my realization on this matter earlier, I found myself being able to, at the same moment, be present with and as the Causer as well as the Experiencing “receiver” of what was brought into being.
That is, I was getting the whole truth of the new condition of existence.
Please tell me what you find on the above.
Rog
Yes, I agree with you, Roger.
I call this state or condition of being aware of "both ends" the state of Simultaneity.
Being aware or knowingly being a God-like presence and also happily going about the activities of "down here". Or "in this world but not of this world."
I had a lady short while ago visiting us. She is into all stuff "spirituality" and the like. A lot of piled-on-top concepts, not integrated at all. All over the place, windows open not knowing from where she is looking type of condition.
She was confused about time. She says "there is no time in the universe".
I asked, which universe? :D
After some talking and coaching she realized that you can't apply "truth" from one domain of existence to another domain of existence.
How could she run an Incident from beginning to end if there is not time?
She "knew" and "heard" that there is no time but she couldn't integrate the data in a way that she could work with it practically.
Both statements are true but apply to different domains and states of existence.
There is no time -- There is time. It's a paradoxon and most people can't make sense of it.
The tradegy of too much esoteric and "spiritual" and "psychological" pile-on-topping is that people end up knowing so much they no longer know what they know. ;D
Some of them had insights on personal level, ascensions and elevated states where they touched on truths that go beyond the ordinary. But most of the time they can't relate to others what they've experienced and they lack the framework or paradigm to align it to. That's one of the reasons why we wound up having a multitude of different "schools of thought".
Best regards,
Christian