Ascensionism®

 

Working with you active members of our forum has its rewards—certainly so for me, and I hope you find it so as well.

Yesterday (1-20-24) Anthony was here for a chat and then dinner (I cook) and fine wine.

My standard “patter” when a person comes to me for a case handling or for advice, is to ask them: “So, what is your attention on?”

And I shut up and let them “Itsa” . . . (Definition of “Itsa” is, it’s a this and/or it’s a that . . . “

“Itsa” is a contraction of “it is a” (indicated item, thing or subject). Basically, it is the client opening up to get off their chest the answer to the question asked by the Processor or Coach.

One of the things I’ve observed over the years and came to understand this morning is that clients will routinely not only relate the “feelings” and “I thinks,” but nearly always they relate a description or statement of their CONDITION OF EXISTENCE, which too often has been missed by both client and processor.

By definition, one can see that a “condition of existence” is the outcome or product of causation by the or a dominant Spiritual Presence.

Hopefully, the dominant Spiritual Presence is/was the client him/herself . . . but not always. Often it is a Spiritual Team Mate or a Hidden Who/extraneous other presence.

An example of a very common Condition of Existence case item that gets missed, is that of being absent-being an absence. It is the outcome of the client withdrawing from and/or going absent from that which they don’t want to experience.

As expressed or stated by the client, they’ll often use those words: “I went absent,” “I absenced myself,” “I didn’t want to be there.”

For you lucky folks reading this missive in order to learn to be processors, you can apply this knowledge for yourselves (as I now do). 

In dealing with a client, one would simply ask the question needed to cause the client to see and realize exactly what they have just revealed to you.

With an experienced or subject literate client, one could simply use a patter of first acknowledge the client’s ITSA with, “OK,” (always acknowledge your client’s ista, even if only by nodding your head), and then ask the client: “So, what was or has been the outcome of (repeat the client’s itsa, however to be fluid you should rephrase it in corrected grammar. Where he/she expressed it: “I didn’t want to be there/present,” you would use: “You didn’t want to be there/present.” And change “I went absent,” to: “You going absent.”)

Personally, I am finding on my own case, the mere spotting of the truth of the Condition of Existence I created, particularly in earlier Spiritual Domains of Existence/Earlier Universes, they blow on inspection simply because that spotted Condition of Existence is the actual TRUTH.

And this is the importance of this discovery . . .

The altered Condition of Spiritual Existence is the actual aberration that needs be undone . . . too often in the past we have been misled by “feelings” and “sensations” and “opinions about and other think.”

Using this newly discovered datum, I see the magnitude of my self-inflicted decline from the infinite Spiritual Presence of the Supreme Spiritual Beings Universe down to this nonsense of being encased in time, space, energy and solidified matter.


Infinite potential . . .  awareness of possibilities, and the selection of what/which to empower and give life to.  Spotting this, I recognized I had too often in the past shied away from the (my) empowering of the potentially wanted due to the unwitting I/R of the experience of old unpleasant sensation potentials that also were perceivable from the memories of the past . . . .