Ascensionism®

I chose the word postulate because it has a fuller meaning than the word creation.

For those folks familiar with the works of L. Ron Hubbard, they will be very familiar with the use of the word “postulate” to mean “to create” or “bring into being or existence.”

Regardless of the nuances of difference of meaning between these words consideration, postulate and create/creation, it is the fact of them being performed in a consecutive nature following on from earlier performance of such that is vitally important.

It is the later performance of considerations or postulates that relate to an earlier similar concept or performance that cause the problems besetting human existence we see in the present.

On analysis, it turns out that the troubling persistence of the consecutive considerations and postulates phenomena is the result of us typically only addressing the last of the sequence of the thoughts, and failing to address the whole of the sequence that accumulated into the present.

What folks typically see and address is only the latest on the top of the sequence on the subject—but what in fact exists is the accumulated sequence of considerations all aligned to the earlier thoughts, perceptions or actions. And until the earlier basic experiential conditions, thoughts, considerations and postulates that are the basis of the present expression are addressed, the strife experienced due to contact with the subject area will persist.

The above is my first draft of expressing the realization I had this morning while pottering around :-[

Please comment. Does it communicate or produce any enlightenment???

It does communicate, Roger.
I am also watching and looking into these phenomena lately.
All to do with the SPIEPIR or your expanded SPEIEPIR sequence.

What I see is that the act of creation (following the sequence) often results in debris (residual thoughts, emotions, or new conclusions -- which are postulates also) that "sits on" and clouds Perceptionin subsequent iterations.
So Clarity of Perception is lost and instead the individual recycles this debris and superimposes it on the environment and his new postulates/creations are thusly skewed/colored.

And as you are saying, the individual mostly sees and references the "experience" (including solutions and consequences) of their latest interations.

This then traps the individual in a feedback loop where new postulates or creations are shaped by the debris rather than the original postulate (which is burried).


The debris is of course case. And it sits on perception but also slides in on auto-pilot, cookie-cutter answers to life's challanges. Instead of Evaluation of any sort or new Intentions, these "patterns" run in circles (circuits). In some cases people even shut down Perception (let alone Presence) in areas altogether.

I think Hubbard was onto something. Even his notion of Clear, but he made a mistake by talking about a (permament) state of clear.
There is Clarity of Perception, there is Presence, but if we take on a bigger game we have to process our way through the Unknowns, Unperceived, Non-permeated aspects of the new area. So Clarity of Perception will be challanged, as will Presence and spiritual Dynamism.
The Debris is there because we ran into areas of non-permeation. Now it diminishes our presence, our drive and clouds our perception.

Processes: Experience/Create, Responsibility (and Know & Control) in the area.
Also: What Problem did you run into? How have you been solving it? What have been the Consequences?


Today we are in the possession of much more insight than the 50s and Hubbards tech.
The SPEIEPIR sequence as a model can help to explain everything we need to know about Perception (and clarity of perception), abberration (and how it comes about and where it actually "sits" on the creation sequence). And much better, more direct address to the case.

Best regards,
Christian

Hi guys!

Thanks, Roger, for sharing your insights with us and for making us part of them.

From what I understand, and in agreement with what you mention, there is a sequence where, in the end, something is created as a result. Following the SPEIEPIR sequence, as Christian mentions, something exists because it passes through it.

As I see it, a SPEIEPIR sequence or Creation Sequence can be divided fractally into each part, and we would have small sequences forming a larger or main sequence, but I think it could be a different topic. What I'm getting at is, and this is my point of agreement with what Roger mentions, if we take the basic SPEIEPIR Sequence, the Perception and Evaluation (Aperception) part already contains Knowledge, Precepts, Belief Systems, Opinions, Points of View, etc. Previous experiences, which, if we are not sufficiently aware of them, will influence Perception. Or, if we are aware of them, we will be able to determine if they are objective and help us understand the truth of what we perceive or experience. From there, according to the sequence, we will generate conclusions and decisions based on them. We will also handle the non-optimal aspects triggered by perception, which may influence the formation of conclusions, decisions, and subsequent intentions as the SPEIEPIR Sequence follows.

The key could be for the Spiritual Presence to be so present and aware that it can perceive and experience what it is facing, being able to know the truth of it through the perception and experience of all its parts, including, of course, the previous conclusions, considerations, intentions, thoughts, postulates, etc. that led to the initiation of a SPEIEPIR Sequence and the subsequent creation we have in the present time, whether helping us achieve what we want or distracting us from it.

Sorry if my post is a bit confusing, but I tried to articulate what came to my mind after reading what Roger shared with us  %V^ 

Love.

Jorge

Not confusing at all, Jorge.

I think we are talking very much in agreement about the same mechanics that are at play. Too a large degree.

Christian

Jorge,

Brilliant and helpful post, Mate.

Well done!

Rog