Ascensionism®

Re: HISTORICAL ERRORS

Reply #15 – August 23, 2022, 11:10:54 AM

Well,

Jorge . . . you have it, and very well indeed.

Just as a little note for all you guys, over the recent years (20 or so) as I processed my case, I kept running into a cognition cum experience that revealed to me the way in which I (and probably we) automatically (and involuntarily on an unwitting basis) create what in actuality is our unwanted futures
 

What I kept spotting was that when ever I spotted any item that was not wanted or was un-experiential, my awareness would automatically go to it BEING NOT WANTED TO BE EXPERIENCED IN THE FUTURE . . . and my auto solutions would kick in to solve or otherwise resist it there, in and as the "to be not had future.".

Which, of course created that particular (resisted) future.

The good news is that that particular involuntary replication has pretty much ended now . . .

I give you this little tip to let you know to not be surprised at the crazy stuff one can have running on auto.

Rog

Re: HISTORICAL ERRORS

Reply #16 – August 25, 2022, 08:33:55 AM

Ok Rog, I think I get it !
By the new Is-Ness definition, the initial spiritual creation is already persisting because it was intented be this way, so Alter-Is-Ness is just one of the many forms that we can "add" more mass of a spiritual creation or "fix" it, adding change or altering it, so it can be with the intention 1) to unusually solve to get rid of it (I think it could add "more" persistence because makes more difficult and unwilling to get the truth on it) or 2) fixing it to get an upgrade. 

I think Aperceive-Ness could be a great substitute for the old As-Is-Ness word, and New As-Is-Ness could prevail with its new definition.

Re: HISTORICAL ERRORS

Reply #17 – August 25, 2022, 09:02:06 AM

The way I see it "Is-ness" is what was agreed upon. People often say "it is what it is" but actually mean "it is what we say it is". And when there is consensus, that's the Is-ness. 

In order to transcend "Is-ness" we first need to recognize that we actually are in agreement, in a cultural progamming or otherwise caught into a certain paradigm.
Then it is easier to cognite on what was sourced by us and what was sourced by whom (individuals and group agreements).
Alter-is-ness is in my view more like a personal alteration  from our original observation, intention or creation (each being altering truth for themseves). Originally we created something and then we altered away... and away... but it was all still in our own universe. It is the interaction with others that creates an Isness.
Is-ness must not be bad per se. It's getting massiv and burdensome when we identify too much with the agreements and imagery instead of separating Is-Ness as a condition of existence that was created and ourselves as creators and co-creators.

But really ugly it becomes further down in Not-is-ness when we start to fight it all and get stuck in mortal combat with our own creations and other's sourceness and creations and agreements. Not-isness is like can't have what is or must have a certain way regardless of what the condition actually is. Totally deluded state.

Through processing we can unravel it and come down to the truth (who, where, when, what etc.) and get unstuck again.
The more truth is seen the more rubbish can be undone and we are free to re-align whatever the creation or game.

I believe Hubbard did not correctly define what he means with "condition" and "creation" in conjuction with the above Axioms.
Destruction also is not the best word to use to talk about "ceasing to create", "uncreate", "undo" etc.

Best regards,
Christian

Re: HISTORICAL ERRORS

Reply #18 – August 26, 2022, 04:58:27 AM

Good post Christian!!

I have long observed on the issue of our misused, misdirected Spiritual Life-Force, that counter-forces and counter-creations simply result in the condition of STUCK FLOWS . . . as in, something or another's emanated vision exists and you are dull enough to oppose it, the only result you get is your Life Force, as directed, hangs up at the point in existence (time and space) where your Life Force collides with that which you are opposing in a ridge of STASIS that persists on, getting more and more solid as time progresses.

Hence, since "REALITY" is the result of fused agreement (and note, to oppose something you need to have agreed it exists) all you need to practice in order to be free from that which you do not wish to suffer or experience, is to not agree to its emanation into existence, and/or its continued existence.

That is, to be precise . .  the other Being(s) emanate or projects an envisioned existence you find unacceptable, simply don't agree to its "realitification" by agreeing to or with it.

And to be further explicit, you can undo and withdraw any agreement of yours that you had earlier unwittingly given to the thing.  We do that in processing!

Rog

Re: HISTORICAL ERRORS

Reply #19 – August 26, 2022, 06:55:57 AM

Well put, Roger. Agree totally.

Christian