52
DESPERATELY MANAGING OUR FUTURE
I was reading the below article this morning, and in doing so, connected to the “forces” behind the pressure for war. Of course, it is Spiritual Life-Force (intentions and wants) being deployed by the evil and psychotic Beings involved in the actions to dominate all others they are connected to.
For me, it gave me a heavy mass that introspected me with and by way of an inflowing and collapsing force in on me.
Spotting the “who” and “What” of it, lifted it off, and sent it back to the originators.
I write this and post it for you so you can handle what you might experience of this attack on “humanity” . . . or better put, this attack on us all.
But make no mistake, this action by the nasties affects them as well. Just that they are too insane and occluded to perceived what they are doing to themselves along with this attack they know they are directing at “every other person” on the planet.
It is a rough planet we are living on. This kind of psychosis has been going on all along the time trail. It is the “why” our spiritual awareness and capacities have declined (brought down) since our earliest unimpacted existence.
You folk reading this, and particularly those who are trained processors, and especially those who can regularly Solo Process, can be freed from the effects of this dilemma. Which is why I run this Form.
But you need to be active in the positive use of your knowledge . . . this is not the time to be a “passive passenger” . . . you need to be active in cleaning up what you perceive of this evil and its affect on you along with what you can perceive of the effect it has on our civilization.
The alternative is rather a grim thing to contemplate . . . something strictly for the irresponsible and victim inclined class.
Roger
PS: “Socrates” is the computer program Martin Armstrong created some decades ago to record and analyze all of the economic and behavioral forces on the planet such that the outcome of those forces could be predicted. The results of this brilliant concept have been spectacularly correct since . . . read about it and also listen to his presentations on line, all available via his website.
[justify]Ink: https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/war/nato-to-spend-1-5-trillion-in-2025/?awt_a=1JPVU&awt_l=3P1E&awt_m=8gIYBJ_6NH4vxrVU[/justify]
NATO to Spend $1.5 Trillion in 2025
Posted Sep 3, 2025 by Martin Armstrong |
Spread the love
NATO is not at war, and yet, the alliance has spent more on funding Ukraine than on any other conflict. The Defence Expenditure of NATO Countries (2014-2025) determined that the alliance is expected to spend $1.59 trillion USD in 2025, up from $1.5 trillion in 2024.
The United States continues to uphold the alliance financially, with an estimated annual payout of $980 billion. Canada and Europe are predicted to spend a combined $608 billion on NATO expenses or an average of 2.76% of their GDP. Poland spent more per GDP than any European member at 4.48%, followed by Lithuania at 4% and Latvia at 3.73%. Nordic alliances such as Norway and Denmark are expected to spend at least 3% of GDP on NATO this year.
Before the Russia-Ukraine war, members were spending around 1.8% of GDP. That figure shot up to 2.6% in 2024, now sitting at 2.76%, and WILL increase as a result of the 5% of GDP pledge by 2035 that was agreed upon at the June 2025 Hague Summit.
There is an uneven response to the escalating conflict as certain nations are accelerating toward confrontation while others remain wary of becoming involved financially. The concept of creating a unified Europe to end all wars was a moot point. European leaders heed different risks concerning the war. This is not just about weapons and soldiers. It is about capital flow reallocation.
Trillions will be pulled out of productive use and sunk into defense. That creates fiscal strain, inflationary pressure, and accelerates the collapse of social programs. Defense budgets soared across Europe ahead of World Wars I and II. War produces absolutely nothing but inflation and destruction.
Ahead of the First World War, defense expenditures across Europe began to surge in the decade before 1914. Governments shifted capital from social programs into armaments. Britain expanded its navy to counter Germany, while Germany doubled down on land armies. The press sold it as “deterrence.” In reality, it was preparation for the inevitable confrontation that the cycle dictated. This is precisely how they are deflecting current NATO spending, as if the allied members must multiply their contributions to deter Russia.
The same pattern unfolded before World War II. During the Great Depression, military spending in Germany, Italy, and Japan accelerated while their economies stagnated. By 1935, Germany had already abandoned Versailles restrictions, pouring money into weapons while ordinary Germans endured wage controls and shortages. The rhetoric was that this spending would “create jobs,” but it created war.
Rome followed this path as well. By the third century AD, the military consumed the treasury. Coinage was debased, taxes rose, and confidence collapsed. It was the cost of endless frontier wars that eroded the economic foundation of the empire. Once capital fled, the empire was finished. The same capital flow shift is what we see today with trillions diverted from productive enterprise into defense, financed by debt, which will only accelerate inflation and contribute to the sovereign debt crisis.
NATO’s report outlines more than mere budgets, as it shows where each nation is aligned on the Panic Cycle, propelling warfare. Socrates is projecting the rise in volatility into 2026, and the Panic Cycles align. The West has chosen the path of militarization, and that is precisely what history warns precedes systemic breakdown.
57
CONSECUTIVE CONSIDERATIONS AND POSTULATES
I chose the word postulate because it has a fuller meaning than the word creation.
For those folks familiar with the works of L. Ron Hubbard, they will be very familiar with the use of the word “postulate” to mean “to create” or “bring into being or existence.”
Regardless of the nuances of difference of meaning between these words consideration, postulate and create/creation, it is the fact of them being performed in a consecutive nature following on from earlier performance of such that is vitally important.
It is the later performance of considerations or postulates that relate to an earlier similar concept or performance that cause the problems besetting human existence we see in the present.
On analysis, it turns out that the troubling persistence of the consecutive considerations and postulates phenomena is the result of us typically only addressing the last of the sequence of the thoughts, and failing to address the whole of the sequence that accumulated into the present.
What folks typically see and address is only the latest on the top of the sequence on the subject—but what in fact exists is the accumulated sequence of considerations all aligned to the earlier thoughts, perceptions or actions. And until the earlier basic experiential conditions, thoughts, considerations and postulates that are the basis of the present expression are addressed, the strife experienced due to contact with the subject area will persist.
****
The above is my first draft of expressing the realization I had this morning while pottering around 
Please comment. Does it communicate or produce any enlightenment???
