Skip to main content
Recent Posts
51
Education, Case Notes and Advices / WE ARE NOT ALL THE SAME
Last post by Roger Boswarva -
@V$     (.! 

Copy pasted below is an email reply to a colleague (not on our forum) who I've known for years. He did the old Scientology thing, but quickly "outgrew it." He is a PhD, and all of that, and of course is quite sure his truths are more truth that any others' truth. Historically, I've experienced him get quite testy if one sees things differently to how or what he sees.

My this morning response to him:

Quote
 Mate.
 
I couldn’t clearly hear your presentation as the show progressed, that because we had the music interfering with my reception of your voice . . . recall we had a fixed Home Page of some other site (probably Zoom) stuck on our screens from which the music kept running.
 
I simply gave up on trying to decipher what you were saying . . . giving oneself non-comprehensions is not good sense . . . I value my clarity too much to allow it.
 
The other thing I don’t do is the “Meditation” thingie that has become fashionable in online get togethers. I happen to operate as an infinite awarely present spiritual Being. Doing the routine “center yourself” only collapses and introverts my aware presence, and worse if I follow and allow the session’s leader’s instructions to direct me. I attended the SMN Sunday meditation session once (run by Peter Fenig at the time) . . .  man, being connected to all the attendees at the time, was the most universe collapsing thing I have knowingly experienced (this lifetime).
 
The other thing, you wrote: “I was (you were) conscious, as I was (you were) reading the LOVE meditation, that it wasn't so much to your liking as Prime Mover.
 
On this point, there is a whole lot of science on the issue of Personal Items --- or to use your term, “Prime Mover.”
 
It happens Love IS your item . . . not my item. My item is “Knowingness” or “Knowledge” (as was Alan’s.)  Virgina’s was/is “Creation.”
 
Here’s the science behind it.
 
Many years ago, in 1963, Hubbard also addressed this issue. In his case he addressed it on the basis of “OWN GOALS.”
 
It happens, we each have our own MOST WANTED WANT . . . i.e., what is it we each most want to Be, Do, Have, Experience.
 
The answer to that question is different between individuals.
 
It happens that one’s most wanted want is the hottest item on the case. Get it wrong and you have an explosion on your hands. And when individuals think or feel their personal item is being opposed, invalidated or made nothing of, you have major reactive upset.
 
I noticed you appreciated my write-up of THE EIGHT BASIC ELEMENTS AND AREAS OF SPIRITUAL POWERS as enumerated in my submission to the Russian “Open Dialogue” call.
 
How  THE EIGHT BASIC ELEMENTS AND AREAS OF SPIRITUAL POWERS came to be delineated was that we were following the thread from 1963 relating to the deployment of our spiritual Life-Force in pursuing our most Wanted Wants, as in Own Goals, etc.  
 
What turned up in the research was the commonality of these Eight Basic Elements and Areas of Our Spiritual Powers.
 
It demonstrated that there is not simply ONE expression of our powers, faculties or expression of existence that is most important or “right” for everyone. Each individual has his own different focused “most important” that empowers and aberrates him/her.
 
Historically, one can observe groups loose membership, wars get declared, enemies are made all because of the invalidation and/or rejection of individual peoples’ “Most Wanted Want.”



 I believe I posted my submission to the Russian call for essays for their "Open Dialogue" earlier on the forum. In case my memory is off, here again are the 8 basic spiritual powers:


Quote
To-date, good progress has been made in attaining this ideal by the team I have worked with over the last seven decades . . . however, the findings published under the title Ascensionism® are as yet not broadly known. The “Gatekeepers” of scientism shun “the not invented here.”
Here is an example of what should be known and put into practice if we are to enjoy a harmonious and prosperously operating civilization. It speaks directly to our spiritual human existence, its Presence, Life-Force, Volition, Characteristics and Virtues—all being elements required if we are to enjoy the harmoniously co-created, co-empowering and prosperous civilization this Open Dialogue Project envisions.
THE EIGHT BASIC ELEMENTS AND AREAS OF SPIRITUAL POWERS
Each of the 8 basic areas: 1. HONOR 2. PRESENCE, 3. LOVE, 4. TRUTH, 5. RELATIONSHIPS, 6. KNOWLEDGE, 7. INTEGRITY, and 8. VOLITION & CAUSATION contains vast areas of knowledge, mastery and awareness. It will take many years to get them all fully into an OPTIMUM VOLITIONAL STATE of existence.
1.
HONOR: The honest and truthful recognition, validation and co-empowerment of others and their positive existence and causation, along with that of our own presence and causation.
2.
PRESENCE: You being wholly willing and able to be powerfully PRESENT, exhibiting your wants and intentions.
3.
LOVE: The honoring and appreciation of the native goodness, rightness and truth of the spiritual presence of those you connect with, and the harmonious facilitation of their participation and co-creative causation in the Life you share.
4.
TRUTH: the exact manifestation of what is wanted and intended by an emanating individual along with the exact receipt, apperception and comprehension by the receiver of what was emanated by the causative presence.
5.
RELATIONSHIPS: the result of choosing to be in ALIGNMENT with another’s presence and intentions for future conditions of existence.
6.
KNOWLEDGE: the awareness and appreciation of both who and what exists and what potentially can be brought into being to enhance existence.
7.
INTEGRITY: wholeness and completeness in alignment with the truthful actuality of intention.
8.
VOLITION & CAUSATION: without the willingness, capacity and actuality of causation and creativity via the emanation of Spiritual Life-Force, there is no expression of the above seven potentials of existence.
Each of these elements of your spiritual presence and power can be expressed positively in an empowering manner, or negatively in a destructive manner.
Each of these elements of your spiritual existence, virtues and powers can be addressed with procedures for their empowerment and increased facility of practice and application. This is well
researched and proven effective. Yet, most of humanity have no particular awareness of these component powers and virtues of their spiritual existence.
Knowledge of the materials outlined above as our Eight Basic Spiritual Powers if known and positively practiced by humanity would result in a wondrously enjoyable and prosperous civilization.
Conversely, what we currently see and experience is the constant violation of the principles espoused in the discovery of THE EIGHT BASIC ELEMENTS AND AREAS OF SPIRITUAL POWERS.
International politics is rife with the constant dishonoring of
 



53
Wins & Successes In Application / Re: Clearing away enormous charge on "Exchange with others"
Last post by Roger Boswarva -
Well done on the solo action, Anthony!!  And boy, oh boy, what a hot item to get handled that "not wanting to be known" as the blocker to receiving exchanges, must have been!!

I too have had the "not wanting to be known" solution deployed (so I could not be made experience the abuse from "others/another") . . . it is, in actuality, a major self sabotage that caused me to actually become unpresent and non-existent to others . . . all in an effort to not be affected by their abuse!

Silly, silly solutions we can have running on involuntary replication!

Roger
55
Wins & Successes In Application / Clearing away enormous charge on "Exchange with others"
Last post by knowledgeracer -
I did a very powerful session with Roger on the subject of Exchange. It was specifically on exchange with others in a small business setting. This has been a major obstacle for me as it has been highly charged.  Roger chose to run Clean Slate on "exchange". We uncovered the thought, "it's hard to exchange".  When we got to the moods part of the clean slate run down, the emotion of shame came up. A lot of charge blew off using the command of what part of shame are you willing to experience, what part of shame would you rather not experience. The session ended with my being in a winning state and lot of cognitions and charge blown off. 

I continued this session in a solo fashion at home using the expanded clean slate process. The first command I happened to engage with was "what about exchange must not be experienced". The charge was so heavy that I couldn't come up with an answer. So I decided to just throw out answers and see what would read on the meter. I found my answer after a bunch of items. These items were fear of being known, fear of being found out, and fear of being exposed. They were all compacted into a huge mass of charge. This mass was a major blocker to exchange. I ran repeater on the following control phrases - "don't be known, don't be found out, don't expose yourself" for a while. The meter and I experienced a large number of blowdowns. A vast amount of life force particles were set free. 

I now attribute a lot of this charge to my career exchanging as a healer in past lives during the Roman Empire, the Middle Ages and the Witch Hunts in Early America. All these earlier  periods of time as a healer ended with a painful punishment where I (my body) was put to death. Hence my reluctance to exchange in an independent manner became quite solidified.  This charged item, exchange, has been screwing me up for many lifetimes and really screwing me up this lifetime. 

Still need to finish the run down as exchange is a very large topic but I have made serious progress on this topic of Exchange. 

Anthony
57
Wins & Successes In Application / Re: Unknowns in an Area lead to Inconsequentiality
Last post by Roger Boswarva -
Good catch Rog!

I've been reading and studying this subject and I have a question.

To locate the ítem to handle by going backward in the sequence, could these be the (rough) questions we could use?

Forwards:
Perception Step: What are your perceptions about (the situation, area or subject)?
Evaluation Step: What evaluation(s) do you get about (what you perceived)?, or, As a (Spiritual Bieng / Godlike Being) how do you evaluate (what you perceived)?
Intention Step: What do you choose (or want) to do about (the evaluation)?

Backwards:
Intention Step: What did you want to be/do/have (the intention) for?
Evaluation Step: What evaluation led you to want to be/do/have (the intention)?
Perception Step: What situation did you perceive that led you to formulate the (evaluation)?
Perception Step: What did you perceive about (the situation)?
Jorge, it may be that our native languages have different grammar constructs in that we place our adjectives differently . . . so I'll reword my thinking to and observations to be more fully precise.

Basically, development of either a SPEIEPER or an IVUPAMI occurs because we are dealing with life and we come across situations that we have to deal with or otherwise manage. And the way we deal with what we have to handle follows our analysis-cum-evaluation of what we perceive the thing/situation to be.

Doing it all in solo session, as I do, I would simply look to, "What was the prior situation I perceived, and what was my evaluation/analysis of it that led to the INTENTION that began the IVUPAMI forming.

In processing a client, one would have to form the question in the grammatical sense of the client's native language (or English if they are fluent in it).

Edit-PS . . .  I just had a cognition while reviewing all  this . . .

My observation and cognition is that in my case state, I span enormous amounts of time trail.  When I view things to be handled in session, I automatically span the relative time trail span that includes all of the event that is the effect/outcome (example the actual IVUPAMI mass), PLUS the prior Time Stream event(s) that preceded and caused or led to the creation of the IVUPAMI.

I my earlier years, and this is likely the case with all of your regular clients . . . they are NOT spanning that amount of time . . .  they are stuck in and battling the EFFECT POINT at the end of the cycle. Folks suffering the effects of a MASS, Engram, or UPSET are stuck in the end point-outcome of the event.  What preceded and set up that effect and outcome, they have lost awareness of.

And the reason for this occlusion on their/our case is our typical wrong answer solutions such as: going unpresent and absencing of self from what we don't want to experience, running not-know, and such.

Hence the importance of the point that I have raised concerning locating and handling the prior set-up and evaluations and decisions that led to the fixing and hang up of the unwanted.

Rog


Rog
58
Wins & Successes In Application / ANALYSIS OF THE CURRENT VALIDITY OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
Last post by Roger Boswarva -
A hot topic this . . . 

As you long time members know, I am am a member of various scientific and professional associations, and hence it has always interested me to analyze and understand their practices and prejudices that determine relative value of performance.

As noted in the linked post on "X" I discuss the reason why the cult of "Scientism" has rather fanatically restricted itself to investigation of the Physical Universe aspects of existence, even when they say they are investigating the "mind" it is always done in terms of the mind being part of the physical universe (of the Brain).  But then, "Science" as currently practiced has no clear or correct definition of what actually and exactly is  the mind and how did it come into existence.

In any event, I recently had the insight of exactly why modern scientific inquiry became stuck and restricted to seeking knowledge only into the physical and considering that the only valid research is that which has been aligned to or validated by physical universe means . . . the notion actually exists that any knowledge gained by pure perception and not "validated or proven" by math or other physical universe reference is invalid.

The truth of our existence as Spiritual Beings is not a subject of knowledge pursued in "science."

The reason for this is written up in the submission I had attempted to present to the Russian sponsored "Open Dialogue
https://dialog.russia.ru/en/about/ . . . but it seems we in the USA have a censorship block preventing communication and exchange of ideas with Russia via the internet.
You guys can read all about it on my recent Post on "X" here: 
https://x.com/RogerBoswarva/status/1983236301584277658

I'd appreciate it if you'd read it and make lucid comments, cross post it, etc., such that others begin to notice it.

Rog

59
Wins & Successes In Application / Re: Unknowns in an Area lead to Inconsequentiality
Last post by Christian -
Roger wrote:

In the case of IVUPPUMIES what is being missed is the PRIOR situation attempted to being solved by/with the INTENTION that begins the IVUPPUMIES’s existence and accumulated charge.
 
Looking at all of this I see I would add to and preface the IVUPPUMIES handling I would look to (locate) the prior situation that needed “handling” based on the evaluation that led to the INTENTION that began the IVUPPUMIES sequence.

Ha! Yes, good one!
I will have a look how it would apply to my current scenario!

Thank you Roger!

Christian
60
Wins & Successes In Application / Re: Unknowns in an Area lead to Inconsequentiality
Last post by Jorge S. -
Good catch Rog!

I've been reading and studying this subject and I have a question.

To locate the ítem to handle by going backward in the sequence, could these be the (rough) questions we could use?

Forwards:
Perception Step: What are your perceptions about (the situation, area or subject)?
Evaluation Step: What evaluation(s) do you get about (what you perceived)?, or, As a (Spiritual Bieng / Godlike Being) how do you evaluate (what you perceived)?
Intention Step: What do you choose (or want) to do about (the evaluation)?

Backwards:
Intention Step: What did you want to be/do/have (the intention) for?
Evaluation Step: What evaluation led you to want to be/do/have (the intention)?
Perception Step: What situation did you perceive that led you to formulate the (evaluation)?
Perception Step: What did you perceive about (the situation)?

Powered by ElkArte 1.1.8 | Credits | RSS Feed
© Copyright 2015 - 2026 — Ability Consultants Inc.