Skip to main content
Topic: REALITY & WHY NEGATIVE INCIDENTS OFTEN DON’T ERASE[ (Read 93 times) previous topic - next topic

REALITY & WHY NEGATIVE INCIDENTS OFTEN DON’T ERASE[


REALITY & WHY NEGATIVE INCIDENTS OFTEN DON’T ERASE

As you know we have the quite accurate and breakthrough datum that REALITY is brought about by the fusing of telepathically projected images by agreement.  That is, one individual creates and projects a VISION of what is or will be, and another fuses the envisioned image with his/her agreement.

Voilà . . . persistence and solidity!

I have recently had to help another handle the continuum of certain unwanted “conditions.”

It has been the case that a lot of what has “hung up” has been addressed and inspected a number of times . . . and yet, still the continuum.

Well the answer is that doing a typical Dianetics-cum-Psychology type “inspection” or experiencing of the events or connections related to the unwanted conditions just does not get it done!!

But, to be noted is that the Dianetics and psychology gigs are only addresses to the effects, not the causation of what is that ails you.

Unwanted conditions of existence that hung up are the result of FUSED ENVISIONED IMAGERY.

I am writing this ditty as a result of colliding with this phenomena recently and having to apply the precision of the tech point above to help a friend undo the hex (definition: noun: An evil spell; a curse) placed by an old American Indian Chieftain cum Medicine Man on the property she recently purchased, following his seeing his people, women and children, slaughtered by the US soldiers in the days of the take-over of the west by the “White Man.”

The hex, of course, was a vision of what would befall any who occupied the land thereafter.

Five valued animals (horses, etc.) just simply died when they should not have . . . things kept going wrong around the place.

Learning this, I got busy looking for the imagery bringing this about along with the “who” was the source. I did this from here in New York, addressing the area in the mid-west Denver area.

This was just last week . . . I am not talking about years ago.

This principle is importantly used in our “Self Sabotage Handling.” A person is induced to self-sabotage due to being caused to agree and fuse a negative telepathically projected image from another.

To be noted is that spiritual communication is all based on projection and transfer of envisioned imagery, and as modulated by mood.

I attach the AGREEMENTS & FALSE REALITIES HANDLING so you can get your head around this vital tech point.  Also, the LOCKED IN MORTAL COMBAT handling exposes much on this.

I also invite you to use these powers and abilities you have. Most have no idea of their true capacity to handle the game of life and their part in it.

The above is an example of the responsibility for and cause over the conditions of existence we individually can exert.

The future is bright knowing this.

(I have pinned this post as the tech related in it is of major importance.)

Rog

Re: REALITY & WHY NEGATIVE INCIDENTS OFTEN DON’T ERASE[

Reply #1
I'd like to share a small, (alteration or addition?) I used with the "AGREEMENTS AND FALSE REALITIES" Rundown. Although I have used this rundown in the past with good results, your post prompted me to revisit some this lifetime issues which I felt needed some more attention.

The first time I used this RD, a few years ago, I found some of the commands a little confusing which kind of hung me a bit, Its the question 2b , 2e and 2g. I found the commands were easier to understand and run when I ask (THE projected image) as opposed to (projected image)

The original 2b: "Who else went into or did(who) get into agreement with the projected image of (projected image.)?"
I modified it slightly to : "Who else went into or did(who) get into agreement with the projected image of (THE projected image.)?" I also added "the" for questions 2e and 2g.

Maybe I doing it wrong but I found that with the addition it ran smoother.

You guys are welcome to comment .

 

Re: REALITY & WHY NEGATIVE INCIDENTS OFTEN DON’T ERASE[

Reply #2
Hey, you got a good positive result!  What's to grumble with that?? :)

Just as comparable data, in virtually all the processes, where the question or command is as you cite it: (projected image) . . . one does not use those words "projected image" in the question or command, but replaces those words with the actual name of the image as articulated by the client in answering the earlier question; example: "What negative image has the who fused on you?" . . . to which the client answered, "That I will always fail!"

We replace "projected image" with the name/articulation of the image "That I will always fail."

Mario also ran into this in the last video we did when reading the commands as written by Alan in his shorthand:  . . . "From where could a (. . . ) communicate to you?"   The "a (. . . )"  threw him.  He didn't know he had to replace the three dots with the name of the item ("a Dominator")



Re: REALITY & WHY NEGATIVE INCIDENTS OFTEN DON’T ERASE[

Reply #3
Hi guys!

I've had this idea about hexes for a long time and not clearly I thought that they themselves were someone else's "wants" on someone else and how to vanish it but I wasn't sure, until now, as ever thanks Roger for this great acknowledgment and use of technology. I believe the positive optimal opposite would be the "blessings" which would be golden zone visions of what the other person wants for their life and living, but I believe that first the person must fully articulate and define their own optimal visions and then we agree with it so as not to screw up with an incorrect vision haha.

About the post of @JulianB there is a good chance to clarify it, and thanks again Roger for doing it. In the written format of the processes, the orders or questions that the processor asks most of the time are in bold letters and in quotation marks. Within these orders or questions there are parts, most of the time, between parentheses and underlined, which, as mentioned Roger, what the client has previously articulated is placed, and when asking the question or giving the order one mentions it when reading that space, I think this is in order to focus attention on the specific item and that not be confused with someone else or confused with a generality and keep the client's attention on the area or item.

Thank you all!

 

Powered by ElkArte 1.1.8 | Credits | RSS Feed
© Copyright 2015 - 2026 — Ability Consultants Inc.