RESEARCH AND RESEARCH ANALYSIS — INTERPREATION ERRORS
RESEARCH AND RESEARCH ANALYSIS — INTERPRETATION ERRORS
(This item is posted in among our technical subject matter because it refers to and exemplifies a key technical point.
As you all know, I am constantly applying the dictum that “ALL OF LIFE IS A PROCESS.”
And more importantly, is the knowingly applying a or the correct process for the endeavor I am engaged in.
For me, the process I am constantly engaged in is the process of “reaching to perceive, understand and to know the truths of our existence.”
Correctly done, this results in the bodies of knowledge we refer to as “SCIENCE.”
On inspection, I find that most of the loud-mouthed scientific pundits actually don’t know what the word “science” means or cannot easily or correctly define it.
Doing a “Google” on this (and Google does a far better job of it than duckduckgo.com) we learn the following:
Origin
LATIN LATIN OLD FRENCH
scire . . . . scientia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . science
know middle English
Middle English (denoting knowledge): from Old French, from Latin scientia, from scire ‘know’. The main modern sense developed in the late 18th century.
And doing the dictionary dance is quite instructive, such that it will likely give you an understanding of why this important topic became so screwed up!
As you also know, I am in very regular contact with the PhD types at two groups who are very interested in disseminating the truths they have “learned” regarding our spiritual existence and capacities: the Scientific and Medical Network, and the Institute of Noetic Sciences. I was earlier a member of the American Association for the Advancement of Science for ten years or so, but gave up on that lot.
And one of the things I constantly observe among these folks is the error of illogical analysis of what is perceived or experienced in their research endeavors.
Of course, we in our Ascensionism.org group have the technology of how precepts not only give us false perceptions but also misdirect and pollute our efforts to analyze and evaluate what is contacted and experienced in our reach to understand and know the truths we are contacting in our research.
One such precept that has gravely polluted the “scientific enterprise” is that the physical universe of energy and matter is primordial and that all of life stems from it. Indeed, Crick and Watson asserted this notion forcefully when they stated that all of our actions, activity and thought is the result of the atoms and molecules of our DNA bouncing about.
Personally, I’ve never seen atoms or molecules or DNA originate anything. My observation is that they are responsive to causes upon them from the Spiritual Presence they exist within.
Observation of human and animal life shows that when the animating Life-Source Spirit is no longer actively present, the bodily atoms and molecules are lifeless.
The attached “Scientists prove DNA can be reprogrammed by words and frequencies” article exemplifies this error. It reverses the sequence of causation relating to the physical universe.
As I insert as my critique in the article at the point the error occurs:
“They found that the alkalines of our DNA follow a regular grammar and do have set rules just like our languages. So human languages did not appear coincidentally but are a reflection of our inherent DNA.
“Error here . . . OPINION and faulty thought and analysis entered here. We did not “follow” the DNA formula . . . the DNA construct is as a consequence of replicating our spiritual communications paradigm.”
My personal observations on the subject of our Spiritual Life-Force presence and of our causation in the game of “Life” is that we Spiritual Beings existed long before the introduction of physical energy and matter. Indeed, physical energy and matter were created by us as a solution to handle unwanted experiences. These have been delineated and can be addressed by any honest, capable (and brave) researcher.
It is to be noted that the precursor to physical energy is the Spiritual Life-Force we each possess and which can be directed and deployed to form particulate energy and “matter,” or which now can be directed as a vector and impulse to produce motion in elements of the physical universe.
We see this, for example, when we choose to move a limb of our body: we direct our life-force via directed attention which constitutes the impulse that sends electrons down the appropriate nerve lines of the body.
Having said all the above, I must, in fact, compliment the researchers and authors of the attached document I have critiqued. It is, in fact, a brilliant piece of research that has elucidated some very important observations. They have done stella work. The “little” error I have picked up on, while important, is minor in the scheme of the overall importance of what these researchers have revealed.
The value of this work by Grazyna Gosar and Franz Bludorf is that it further validates the findings demonstrated by Dr. Bruce Lipton.
PS: I would very much like to hear from you guys on this particular post . . . it will give me guidance on my dealing with the PhD types.
Topic: RESEARCH AND RESEARCH ANALYSIS — INTERPREATION ERRORS (Read 62 times)
previous topic - next topic
