RETURING FROM OZZ, TO COLLIDE WITH WEATHER CHAOS
RETURING FROM OZZ, TO COLLIDE WITH WEATHER CHAOS
Returning from Sydney last night, and checking my email and online traffic, I see we have a weather disasters afoot: example: frigid temperatures in the N. Hemisphere wiping out the food crops, with more bad freezes on the way.
Of course all the political yap is about destroying our modern civilization by way of killing efficient energy production . . . and the strangulation of honest journalism and a free press.
There are three videos In this report that I am currently unable to copy to you.
"Journalists Should Do Their Job"
The drive for Net Zero is a catastrophe for the people. It is a dastardly money and power grab masked as environmentalism. But it's a drive that is exhausting itself. It's pushed too hard and is now in pieces. The people have awoken, finally.
More than $6 trillion has been spent globally on renewable energy over the past few decades, including vast sums on 300,000 wind turbines. Yet fossil fuels still account for more than 80% of the world's energy consumption, where it stood at the end of the last century, with the economic behemoths of China and India only increasing their reliance on coal and gas.
UK journalist/political presenter Andrew Neil has been calling out the circus for years.
It's a pity Neil didn't do the same when it came to the criminal COVID-19 lockdowns, but that's another story.
In a recent addressing (or dressing down) of the government's plans (or lack thereof), he said this: "In this very building, in this Parliament, there was near unanimity in going for Net Zero. I'm not sure there was even ever a debate on it, it just became the law of the land. It is when there's a consensus like that, that journalists should do their job."
Video courtesy of Net Zero Watch on X.
Here's that GB News interview Neil was referring to, from 2021:
And here's a more recent interview, further exposing UK politicians as an unknowing know-nothing pawns of the establishment:
It has been made difficult for today's mainstream journalists to do their job (and keep them, at least). Roadblocks to the truth have been put in their way. These guardrails keep The Narrative in check. That's no excuse for bad reporting, none at all, it exposes modern journalists as spineless agents of the state, not in anyway deserving of the title.
But there are hoops, hurdles and rules — truth isn't enough, particularly when it comes to anything 'global warming'.
Journalists are being handed a guide instructing them on how to "properly" report on extreme weather and climate change. The guide blatantly seeks to limit investigative endeavors and instead promote a single, universal take on the topic.
This World Weather Attribution initiative is supported by the University of Oxford and Imperial College London (the latter should ring a bell to those in the UK, with Imperial College now synonymous with doom-and-gloom —and woefully inaccurate— COVID-19 modelling), and its guide is intended to "help" journalists navigate this key question: "Was this event caused by climate change?"
“First, it introduces the science of ‘extreme event attribution’ — the method of attributing (or not) the degree to which the weather event was influenced by climate change,” reads the guide’s introduction.
“Second, it lays out the statements that can reliably be made about some of the extreme weather types of greatest public interest, even when no specific scientific study is being performed. This is based on current state-of-the-art knowledge using studies of recent extreme events and the latest IPCC report.
“And further down, it provides an easy-to-read checklist for each type of extreme weather event.”
Clearly, this guide is antithetical to true journalism. It reads more like a 1984 boot camp seeking to restrict a journalist’s curiosity and ability to dig, which will ultimately render the profession obsolete. Forwarding their global warming agenda is clearly the aim here, but said agenda would be just as well served with automated bots programmed to assign any gust of wind or passing cloud to ‘the climate emergency—which is basically what they’re getting. They want journalism, by its definition, dead.
“Every heatwave in the world is now made stronger and more likely to happen because of human-caused climate change,” continues the guide. “Journalists should be confident of attributing any extreme heat to human caused climate change.”
What we're watching is a state propaganda wheel turning in real time.
—It’s sickening to see, that stomach-churning nervous kind.
The guide stumbles on numerous occasions, unsurprisingly. In fact, almost every other paragraph is a slap in the face to honest scientific inquiry.
It flat-out lies and all: “Every instance of extreme cold across the world has decreased in likelihood and intensity due to climate change.” Their own doctrine calls that one out: "Cold outbreaks are expected to increase in intensity as the Arctic warms" ... "It seems very counterintuitive and surprising that a warmer planet can actually increase your odds of experiencing severe winter weather events--but that’s what our research has shown," said Judah Cohen, principal scientist at Verisk Atmospheric and Environmental Research.
Then you have Kristina Dahl, of the Union of Concerned Scientists, who has a more reasoned take: "It’s a very active area of research and something that scientists are passionately debating and trying to figure out at the moment. It’s definitely not settled science." Watch out Dahl, you're verging perilously close to those guardrails.
Below is The Bible's Guide’s "easy-to-read checklist for each type of weather event":
Reporting extreme weather and climate change — a guide for journalists
Again, any journalist adhering this propaganda pamphlet is undeserving of the title.
Enjoy your weekend.
I'll be back Monday, as always.
Best,
Cap
Topic: RETURING FROM OZZ, TO COLLIDE WITH WEATHER CHAOS (Read 74 times)
previous topic - next topic
