Re: The most important and valuable technical post I have made to you guys.
Reply #6 –
Discovering the earlier Universes was quite the advancement!
It's a mystery to me how Hubbard was so myopic to call the BTs/Body-Thetans.
The one guy who took care of Hubbard in his last days even told the story that Hubbard wanted him to built an e-meter for him that would electro-shock the BTs.(Uuuhhmmm? I don't know about that
). If I remember right the man's name was Frank Sarge Gerbode who later repackaged Dianetics as TIR.
BTW Roger, the stories you told in the youtube video you linked above... What a mess and abberation the structure of Scientology is and was. And so long ago. I really thought for a long time (while still in) that it is due to Hubbards absence, but no, it was set up incorrectly and supid people routinely bypassed correct sequences and often the most productive, winning contributors.
Back in the day I loved to "dissiminate" Scientology to new people and in the local mission I am to this day the FSM who brought the most new people in and on service.
It was nothing of the scale of your Lectures with dozens and dozens of people a week, but it was a good game to confront people with new ideas and intorduce them to something that would help them, or at least so I thought.
All of them are gone now. Staff and public. The last ones left with me in 2012.
I met a friend last week who is still somewhat "on lines" and he told me that Miscavige recently published new "corrected" green on white volumes. The Org Board had false data in it, sneaked in by SPs.
Because they killed their reputation and dissemination outwards doesn't work in the internet age Miscavice has to invent stuff to "expand" inwards to long time Scientologists.
I wonder how anyone can stick around for so long and not see the schtick. Miscavige comes up with "corrected" tech to handle THE "why" for almost 40 years.
But also their game is futile. Scientologists believe that tech can't go IN when ethics is OUT. But what when the tech was incorrect to begin with? And all doors to research and find "a better bridge" where closed, despite Hubbard's invitation to do so in Book One.
They're trapped in a losing paradigm.
Best regards,
Christian