OMNI-RESPONSIBILITY VERSUS BLAME

July 20, 2024, 01:26:40 PM

NOTE: This is an article which Roger posted on another forum. The date of the original post was December 14th, 2015.
I am bringing it back as it contains important data for use in session and day to day life.

OMNI-RESPONSIBILITY VERSUS BLAME

Listed among our basic Knowledgism processes is that wonderful old R/D for restoring to you , the client, your basic powers, abilities, awarenesses, knowledge and all such things that you want to exercise or deal with is: RESPONSIBILITY.

The commands/questions are pretty simple and basic.

You can use:
“Connected to (area of life, existence, ability, power, subject or item) . . .”
Or alternatively use:
“What part of (area of life, existence, ability, power, subject or item) . . .”
Then, added to the above is:
“. . . are you willing to be responsible for” and
“. . . would you rather not be responsible for?”

The above is the workhorse for handling one’s relationship for regular folks. It restores willingness and ability to cause!

On a very advanced case where you would be upgrading responsibility and power on an omni-awareness, omni-presence, co-empowerment level, you could use the command that would directly process the omni-aware, omni-powerful Being. It would go something like this:
“As an omni-aware Presence (or Being or such) connected to (item) what omni-responsibility are you willing to exercise or implement?” / “. . . rather not exercise or implement?”

For folks not familiar with the term “OMNI” here is the simple definition and usage:

omni-
combining form
1. all; of all things. "omniscient"
2. in all ways or places. "omnicompetent"

But most folks are nowhere near processing at an omni-responsibility level. They are operating as isolated Beings having troubles with all about them and BLAMING all about them for their troubles.

Hubbard did this. You folks who are aware of the upper “OT Levels” know that Hubbard was into blaming all those nasty “body thetans” (BTs) for his condition. And information we have from those closest to him in his final years tells us that even then, he was still blaming his BTs for his condition.

In actuality, any practice that tells you that your unwanted conditions or behaviors can be blamed elsewhere than with you and your own powers of choice, cause and sovereignty, is selling you a booby-trap.

YOU are ultimately responsible for your condition of existence and behavior.

To place responsibility for such elsewhere; such as with “BTs” or “Entities” or parents or other influencers is to be, in actuality, sabotaging you and your true powers, abilities and responsibility. Don’t buy it, it’s a trap. It dishonors and undoes your truth, powers and ability.

You will see this truth exemplified in Knowledgism’s wonderful CAUSATIVE PROCESSING.

These are the first words in this R/D.

Quote

VITAL DATA — ALL PROCESSORS

LAW: WHAT THE CLIENT IS REACTING TO (complaining or moaning about, or being critical of, the victim or effect of), IS WHAT THE CLIENT IS SECRETLY, COMPULSIVELY DOING HIMSELF.

That may be a hard pill to swallow for some folks . . . but as clients progress they really do come to see how their true and actual OMNI-RESPONSIBILITY declined down the scale of existence through responsibility for self alone and then on down to BLAME of another/others and then on further down to no-responsibility for anything or any part of the game.

I am currently guiding two of our Codees though our stupendous “Free Radical Identity Handling Procedure.” And it has been fascinating for us to see how the conditions of existences, along with the Games these identities created and operated on, on a completely unknowing irresponsible, blame all and everyone else basis, were actually the result of our own cause! We ourselves decided things that brought about conditions of existence and operation that got us into the unknowing and irresponsible state these Free Radical Identities occasioned.

The second half of the R/D addresses “Parity With The Gods” . . . the first half cleans up the mess and unknowing irresponsibility that is the lot of the Free Radical Identity, and the second half unlocks how you set up the mess!

Sweet justice, is all I have to say about it!

In Knowledgism we have all the technology needed to gradiently restore your powers of cause in the game, along your omni-responsibility for all parts and players. Don’t settle for anything less.

And especially, don’t indulge any practices that teach that you can/should place the blame or responsibility for you condition or behavior elsewhere than as under your volition and knowing control. To do so is to undermine the truth of you and your true powers and abilities . . . for that is the route of self sabotage that brought us to this human, messed up condition.

It might “feel good,” it might even be considered a “discovery” that there is someone/something to blame for your condition that heretofore you were not aware of, but these too are part of the booby-traps. “Feel-goodism” can be an avoidance of what truly needs be addressed and handled, and “new discoveries” too often can be incomplete and thus dangerous cul-de-sacs.

Roger

January 7th, 2016 Roger expanded the ditty, writing:

The thing I would point out here is that the title of the ditty I wrote is OMNI-RESPONSIBILITY VERSUS BLAME . . .

It is about assuming responsibility for all comm-lines and connections and thus being able to recognize and assign correct authorship (source) and cause of what occurs and being able to responsibly determine outcomes and effects . . . the negative expression of which is: "got nothing to do with me," not my fault, I'm not to blame or responsible.; they/the other is to blame.

When one is operating at a high Green Zone level of responsibility one is so aware of what is going on around one and who is doing what, you do get to preventing becoming effect of what you do not want to experience . . . for folks down at the irresponsible level of operating in the low Yellow or Red Zones, well, they are so switched off they do not see shit coming, can't predict outcomes, and of course, everything they suffer is someone else's fault; others are to "blame."

In actuality, while another may well have caused and sourced what you are affected by or suffer . . . one needs to assume responsibility for any such unwanted effects/outcomes in order to handle them otherwise the suffering and the condition of blaming others for it will continue.

So, not having had my second cup of coffee here yet, I'll end this ditty off with the point that in order to fully get to grips with this subject, one needs to differentiate between the related subjects of source and cause versus responsibility.

Indeed, it might even be a profitable thing to take pencil and paper and write down all the ways a Being can be negative and irresponsible for one's area of existence and blaming all others for all causes (including one's own cause on self) that negatively affect you versus knowingly being responsible for all events and effects in one's purview no matter who is the source/cause.

The Cof$ scenario My Canvas described is the Red Zone scenario wherein blame is the ongoing process run by that organization. It is a totally negative processing area of activity: staff constantly being blamed and made wrong for whatever goes on rather than seniors taking responsibility for staff and helping staff improve and get it right. Their only tech applied is blame, and in order to make it "real" they drive staff into monster overruns on O/W write-ups or Sec-Checks looking for "what's wrong," with never a thought to "what is the rightness here that we should be putting in."

R

And a few month later, on July 19th, 2016 Roger added:

It is an interesting thing to revisit subjects such as earlier studied materials or expressions of one’s knowledge, as for example, my posts above.

Been more than 6 months in this case.

Recently, due to particular case gain, I have found myself operating quite often at the Gold Zone level of INFLUENCING. At first, it was a little on automatic as I had ascended to the level but not spotted it as a “power or ability” to put under my full knowing control per our Wins Celebration Handling . . . This because, interestingly enough, this Level of Existence originally felt as though it operated as a Beingness not as a Doingness that can be more easily perceived as, for example, “Production” or “Empowerment” for me can be. (Your mileage might vary!)

These last few days/weeks I have been more aware of what I’m actually doing, and how and from what “position.” And looking at this thread just now brought it home to me with much more and greater clarity. And I do now observe and experience the action of INLUENCING as a doingness, where before I did not.

When (I was) operating lower in the Green Zone, say Interest, Enthusiasm, even Exhilaration; I found I was basically, separate and looking at the Beings I was relating with and to. What they did was what they did, and I had no control over the causation and could only act after the event of their cause. This, of course, is “self-determinism” not “Omni-responsibility.”

And to be noted is the point that, if one is operating at the lower level of “Self-Determinism” wherein one can only act or react after another has caused, well the relationship can be fraught with the potential for disagreement and even oppositional conflict . . . and of course sink lower into blame!

In the recent week or so and particularly just now as I was caused to read the above (someone did a “mention/like that caused me to visit again) I gained the insight of how I operate at the level of INFLUENCING in the Gold Zone . . . the actual mechanics of it (for me). And, to me, it became a point of fascination and vital interest.

“Luckily” I am well schooled in the mechanics of “games,” relationships and the dealing with the activities therein. This all being part of the spiritual literacy one needs to have to both make it to the Gold Zone and to operate there.

What I have found myself doing at this level is that, I pervade and permeate the Beings in my relationships and, in a spiritually loving embrace, imbue them with a (my) vision of what can and ought be for our mutual benefit and enhancement that they can and ought to create or participate in the co-creation of for our benefit. Also to be noted is the point that I also have to be willing to be aware of what they otherwise, without my influence, would likely have created based on their ongoing habits, knowledge and precepts (this includes the precepts and prejudices they ordinarily are operating on).

Thus there is a SPIEPIR sequence carried out (actually a very full one) . . . I as a knowing Spiritual presence imbued with an awareness of what I need and want as to ideals and optimums, permeate and perceive the Being I am relating with to the extent needed to evaluate and align relative importances as to what is needed, wanted and ought be intended for our optimum alignments and co-survival then, learning that, I project an envisioning of the thing to be attained, etc.

Of course there is a caveat on all the above . . . I don’t have to relate to/with or deal with the nasties of the universe. I can equally be responsible for not relating with them and to simply be aware of their existence while keeping them “out of my hair.” (And in this vein, there are a handful of individuals banned from our Forum.)

And, on a further note, it has sometimes taken some time to bring some folks I relate with on a regular basis up out of their automatic relationships habits such that they can be positively influenced . . . this being observed, for example, with the relationships developed on our weekly shopping safari at the Farmers Market, WholeFoods and other stores. Other friendly folks are easily enlivened and brought into co-creating empowerment on first contact . . . this so long as one honors and validates them as a good person and Beingness when first encountered . . . V and I do this routinely with the checkout staff and management at places like WholeFoods and Trader Joe’s stores. (To be noted is that, in the case of Trader Joe’s, I wrote to the CEO about an incident with a toxic personality and her affects on the whole store, the duty manager and customers. Regional Management based from Boston came down and removed the toxic bitch off public lines (she now only works the store room and stocks shelves) with the duty manager who screwed up actually GONE, she ain’t been seen since. Result? Now what a wonderful fun store we have!)

You see, most folks treat the checkout people or service staff at supermarkets as though they are part of the furniture or as robots and not wonderful people!!! And, thus, what do most people get back? What they themselves have projected!! And believe me, this is a point I have discussed with the folks who have become true friends while doing these jobs. . . they are so enlivened by the notion that someone actually sees them as a real live person there on deck; and you have to see how their expressions (we call them “indicators”) turn sour when they relate what it is like dealing with the regularity of most of the traffic they have to deal with on their lines!

And what is the result of treating these service personnel as I do? All these folks visibly brighten up, come out of their routine dreariness and smile big time when they sees us. We get fantastic service, along with it being a pleasure each week to deal with them as friends . . . indeed, it has been known for the butchers at WholeFoods to go to special lengths to get for us the stuff we want . . . one guy even suggesting for us to continue shopping the store while he solves the situation of getting what we want and that he’ll come find us and give it to us when it is done!

In due course, I’ll also be writing up some notes on the subject of Remote Influencing . . . which I find more valuable than Remote Viewing. Remote Influencing is a subject Alan discussed with me in chats shortly before he died.

Roger