THE HANDLING OF CHARGE
On the subject of CHARGE.
As we can see from my foregoing posts, charge built up on the POSITIVE.
That is, we were pursuing a want; intending to do or accomplish something and the directed Life-Force went awry, built and accumulated to produce the untenable experience we now recognize as charge.
When this tech was unraveled, I was at “The Ranch” (early 2001) processing Helen Geltman. She was a Class VIII, and on staff with Alan at The Ranch. Helen (nee McKey) and I go back a fair way, she and I knew each other in London in ’67-’68. She later came to the US, married Frank Geltman and ran the Mission on the upper West Side of Manhattan . . . but of course got betrayed and crushed along with the rest of the Mission Holders in ‘82.
Helen asked me to take her into session. She had had trouble “getting going” and producing. Following her lead as to what she wanted addressed and her indication of what she wanted run, we addressed the usual upsets and negatives 
Nothing was moving . . . no case movement nor TA action.
Then I decided to switch to processing the POSITIVE that should have been there!
This is based on something I discovered back in around November ’98. I might have noted it here before. But basically, I had been running the unpleasant sensation/mood/feeling of INCOMPETENCE in a solo session. Well, it ran very well but when I reached what appeared to be the EP: where was my COMPETENCE!? I had expected all sorts of feelings of competence and powers and abilities to have been restored! But no! I was still without the feeling or experience of competence. I felt quite null.
So I got bright and ran the feeling/experience/concept of COMPETENCE. (This with Experience/Create, our beloved unpleasant sensations handling.) It ran marvelously well with all kinds of the positive going clean and restoring.
A day or two later I had lunch with Alan and told him of my “discovery.”
He replied: “You’ve always got to process the positive!”
I replied: “But hey! That ain’t written anywhere. How are we supposed to know?” I said it with a smile 
(That’s the short version of the incident.)
Finding a positive for Helen and running it did produce gain such that she blew out of session to take a cigarette break. While she expressed wonders at the “big win” and discovery, part of me was thinking she had rabbitted a bit and dived out as the charge was “too much.” All the indicators of that were there. I later found out Helen never did run deep or “thoroughly” . . . but that subject’s another story for another post.
Of course, Alan and I discussed this. The outcome was that we were looking at a formula . . . THE CHARGE IS ON THE POSITIVE, AND THE POSITIVE IS BEING BURIED BY THE CHARGE.
In March of 2001, Alan gave a lecture to us in which he wrote on the flip-chart the first version of the “Charge Handling Process.”
Part of the lecture discussed these points:
ALL charge is present time. It is NOW. BPC is something different, it is either old charge that got accessed/restimed and then missed and not handled, or PT charge that did not get handled, was by-passed, and left on the case encysted as “yesterday’s stuff.”
Charge occurs when you are pursuing a want or intention and you are being blocked or otherwise impeded or interfered with. That is: the Life-Force you are deploying or directing is caused to be jammed, blocked, stopped and it collects as the accumulated energy called “charge.” Alan gave the example of that morning. He was in a hurry on his drive to the ranch on the back roads but an old fuddy-duddy got in front of him and blocked his speedy Mercedes . . . Alan did a very good demo of being charged-up-and-pissed at being blocked.
The Charge Handling Process is actually a very simple process. It’s also hugely very important. It’s one of the processes you’ll get huge mileage out of: you can use it on all areas of charge found: present time-now charge as well as old charge and old BPC that is found. Eventually, you or your client will become so comfortable with dealing with real, live charge it all becomes a “walk in the park.”
The R/D I am posting is as later refined by Alan, it’s not the original we put up on the flipchart . . . but note this R/D is really for lower level or entry level cases. It processes the Being from the effect position, almost as a victim (poor thing). I’ll comment on that.
When Alan finished writing this process on the board and released it originally for the attendees to run on course, it didn’t have mention of ANY intention in the R/D and I went up to him and made this comment: “Alan, I notice you’ve not made mention of the original intention being pursued in that R/D. Why is that?”
He replied, “These guys can’t confront charge, let alone their intentions.” And it said rather disdainfully and almost with a degree of crankiness toward me for questioning him on it. I simply acked, “OK.” But in actuality I did not share his view that they “ALL” were so far south with their cases . . . some I knew could handle the positive.
And so, this leads me to tell you there are two ways that charge can be handled, though Alan only published one of them.
You can chew on the published version for yourselves and see where and how it applies. But following is my own version of charge handling: it is what I run solo for myself and for all my clients and those I case advise. 
This I first used on another person (as distinct from my using it solo) at the ranch who asked me to “Do a charge handling for him.” This shortly after release of this tech.
When an area of charge is encountered . . . either the educated client will originate he has such, or by observing PC indicators and/or meter manifestation you suspect such and ask: “Do you have an area of charge there?” (or some such).
When the client is real on the point that there is an area of charge present, the first step in the R/D is the describe step . . . but concurrent with that and in some appropriate cases I actually then and there with the first realization that there is an area of charge, I ask: “What is the underlying intention or want being pursued that this charge is building up on?”
Often I go straight in for the underlying intention as the first question with a PC. I always do so in my solo sessions.
In other words I want to get the basis of it all at the beginning of the R/D and handling. This way, everything that is then processed and addressed can be correctly aligned, and the PC can be “processed from the top down.”
This in actuality is very important and beneficial, this because the power in and of the charge all stems from the underlying blocked, stopped, interfered with and impeded POSITIVE . . . the underlying intention and want. And when you’ve got that you’ve got the key to resolving the charge and related issues.
Alan’s R/D as released unburdens the area before going for the original, underlying intention.
And also important is that fact that by getting the original underlying intention that began this accumulation of energy and charge, you have THE BEGINNING OF THE “INCIDENT.” If you just address “charge” you are rather too late on the chain or sequence of events and the handling of the charge can feel mushy. But having the original and beginning intention, the later built up charge easily often evaporates on contact.
It is too easy for PCs to get stuck focusing one what’s wrong and what’s out . . . they do forget to go to and restore the prior positives.
I have amended Alan’s Charge Handling Process to reflect this information above.
CHARGE HANDLING PROCESS
Roger Boswarva Version and Amendments to Alan’s
1. Get an area of charge, or Tell me of an area of charge.
(This paragraph and question 0 is Roger’s addition) When a client has an area of charge that is very real to him, the fastest and most effective way to put the client at cause and unlock the charge to recover his spiritual Life-Force back to positive is to at once ask the client:
0 “What is the underlying intention or want being pursued that this charge is building up on?” Or, “What is the underlying intention or want you have there that this charge is building up on?” This question is Roger’s added piece to Alan’s.
a. Describe the charge.
Where is it?
When is it?
What’s its duration?
Tell me what you can about what’s happening to produce the charge.
b. What are the moods in the charge?
c. Are there any moods in the charge you must not experience?
If yes, get them and run Experience and Create processes on them.
Then take each must not-be-experience mood and run:
d. Connected to the mood of (mood), is there an intention?
If yes, get it and run repeater on it.
e. Connected to the mood of (mood),
What have you done?
What could or should you do?
What have you restrained?
What could or should you restrain?
What haven’t you said?
What could or should you say?
What decisions were made?
What have been the consequences of that?
What decisions could or should be made?
What could be the consequences of that?
Repeat c, d and e until the charge dissipates.
Typically, I find the actual charge and hang up has vanished at this stage, but it is wise to check the next step to be sure of completeness. If “nothing more” on the original intention and its charge, go to steps g), h), etc., . . .
f. What original intention were or are you trying to accomplish?
Get the original intention and run repeater on it until the charge on it turns on. Then repeat a to e, and then do g and h.
Note: If while running repeater on the intention it goes more solid or mass accumulates, the intention is too late in the sequence. Ask for the earlier source intention that was attempting to be accomplished and run repeater on it.
If unconsciousness turns on, ask if there is something the client doesn’t want to know, get it and get it fully known.
g. How did you solve this charge?
h. What have been the consequences of that?
Repeat g and h until all solutions and their consequences have been viewed and dissipated.
i. What type of being or identity did you adopt or create to handle this charge?
Get the identity named and run Presence Three from #4 onwards then, Abused–Abuser Unlocking Procedure (Harmony Series 3) from step 3 onward.
Repeat 1 a to i over and over until all areas of charge have been handled.
2. Tell me of a time you experienced charge.
Handle with steps a to i as above.
Repeat 2 a to i over and over until all areas of charge have been handled.
3. Tell me of a time you created charge.
Handle with steps a to i as above.
Repeat 3. a to i over and over until all areas of charge have been handled.
Amended by Roger Boswarva February 6, 2013
27 March 2001
Revised 27 February 2004
Copyright © 2001, 2004
Roger E. Boswarva
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Topic: THE HANDLING OF CHARGE (Read 72 times)
previous topic - next topic
